Perversion or Pervert: Recently members of congress read aloud from books provided or made available in the school library for young students which may have contained abnormal (pervert) sexual acts.

Does the post “Peeling the Onion” regarding the level of responsibility not responding to prevent such material apply? Does it extend to the top level of national responsibility?

Following may be an accurate definition of the contents of the material by Bing search:

A pervert is a term that can have different meanings depending on the context and the perspective of the person using it. Generally, it is used to describe someone whose sexual behavior or preferences are considered abnormal, unnatural, or unacceptable by the majority of society. However, this definition is subjective and may vary across cultures, religions, and historical periods.

According to the OxfordDictionaries, the word pervert can be used as both a noun and a verb. As a noun, it means “a person whose sexual behavior is regarded as abnormal and unacceptable”. As a verb, it means “to alter something from its original course, meaning, or state to a distortion or corruption of what was first intended” or “to lead someone away from what is considered right, natural, or acceptable”.

The word pervert comes from the Latin word pervertere, which means “to overturn, corrupt, or pervert”. It was first used in the 14th century as a verb to mean “to cause to turn aside or away from what is good or true or morally right”. The noun sense of “one that has been perverted” or “one given to some form of sexual perversion” dates from the late 19th century.

Some examples of how the word pervert is used in sentences are:

• He was charged with conspiring to pervert the course of justice by fabricating evidence in the trial.
• Hector is a man who is simply perverted by his time.
• These journalists are perverting the news.
• The will of the people is being perverted by their elected representatives.
• She was accused of being a pervert for having an affair with a married man.
• He was arrested for exposing himself to children and other perverts.

Does the post “Peeling the Onion” regarding the level of responsibility not responding to prevent such material apply? Does it extend to the top level of national responsibility?

What does failure to act to restrict the referenced material as read indicate about the morality of the many levels of responsibility?

Researching what may have been considered a conspiracy theory, it appears that applying logic and reason cannot explain the size of the current cabal in place profiting from every illegal activity imaginable. Is there a trail of evidence? Possibilities are high.

Currently, politicians and law enforcement may be incapable of dealing with it. Mobilization of the military for domestic purposes may be required. Although the military is precluded from doing so. The cabal may have control of it also.

If, as research indicates, the U.S. may be a pawn of a criminal organization.  This may explain the neutering of the news media.

Think Really Big.

Recent observations are filled with multiple charges and legal actions against the past president and his associates.

While at the same time, charges of seemingly criminal acts by the current president and associates appear to go on without hesitation.

The current administration appears to be charging that the past president is responsible for election interference, while at the same time, appearing to do the same with multiple questionable charges and trial date changes to interfere with the upcoming election.

The majority of major media appear to be providing cover for the current president and associates, while daily attacking the character of the past president.

However, it also appears that the onion expressed above may be peeling. What events and issues will be exposed in the future are unknown at this time. However, as the onion is peeled, it may reveal an increasing list of events and issues occurring in the past, and during the upcoming election cycle.

Peeling the onion may begin slowly and increase rapidly. If so, will actors involved and in fear of discovery, begin to desert and reveal the truth?

Question: Will there be revelations of support, or unintended support, for terrorism events and issues identified in the “Cause and Effect Analysis” posting?

Did Attorney General John Ashcroft’s statements in the SOTU 2023 list of international events indicate that possibility? If so, is that the main cause of the charges against the past president? To preclude the ever-increasing possibility of a change in leadership which may expose who or what is at the center of the onion?